-
- Home
- New students
- Current students
- People
- Study Exeter
- Study Cornwall
- Research
- News/events
- Contact us
Politics
International Relations: Power and Institutions
Module POLM502 for 2021/2
Module POLM502 for 2021/2
- Overview
- Aims and Learning Outcomes
- Module Content
- Indicative Reading List
- Assessment
Postgraduate Module Descriptor
POLM502: International Relations: Power and Institutions
This module descriptor refers to the 2021/2 academic year.
Module Aims
The main aim of the module is to illuminate why the main concepts and theories in International Relations take the form that they do. This involves exploring the emergence of IR theory in its historical context. It ought subsequently to be possible for students to reflect critically on their own theoretical assumptions and how they shape claims about the future of world politics. For example, the rise of China, can be understood as a modern articulation about long standing views about revisionist powers in modern world politics.
On successfully completing the programme you will be able to: | |
---|---|
Module-Specific Skills | 1. Demonstrate substantive knowledge of modern IR, the origins of the field, the context in which it developed and the major critical positions adopted towards its development; 2. Identify and discuss the key methodological, conceptual and theoretical debates in IR and demonstrate knowledge in relation to the development of IR as a field of knowledge-production; |
Discipline-Specific Skills | 3. Demonstrate advanced critical, historical and analytical understanding of the development of IR as a field of academic knowledge-production; 4. Exercise informed judgement concerning the practical implications of abstract political principles and ability to locate arguments within an historical context and to understand the relationship between context and theory; |
Personal and Key Skills | 5. Conduct independent research, give well-designed presentations, exercise critical judgment, write cogently and persuasively; and 6. Identify spurious conclusions and distinguish rigorous from merely persuasive argument. |